Why Choice is an Illusion?

Wednesday, May 5, 2021

California Amendments Seek to Weaken Patient Protections, Attestation Provisions Eliminated

Image result for "katy grimes"

By Margaret Dore, Esq.

On February 10, 2021, assisted suicide/euthanasia proponents introduced a bill seeking to amend California's End of Life Option Act. The bill, SB 380, eliminates the Act's 2026 sunset date, and also allows a 15 day waiting period to be shortened to 48 hours in certain circumstances.[1]

Katy Grimes, editor of the California Globe (pictured), had this to say:

When it comes to carrying out the death penalty for convicted murders, the California Legislature finds the lethal drug cocktails "cruel and unusual punishment," which they say is a violation of the Eighth Amendment. Yet lawmakers were more than willing to approve a lethal drug cocktail to allow sick people to kill themselves.  I wrote [this] in 2015 as the California Legislature was considering [passage of the Act].[2]

The proposed amendments also eliminate the Act's "attestation" provisions, which is probably a good thing.[3]

A hearing on SB 380 is set for May 10, 2021. This may be subject to change.

* * *

[1]  Per the Legislative Counsel’s Digest, the existing Act sunsets as of January 1, 2026.  The 15 day waiting period is addressed in the bill itself, Section 2, which states: 

An individual seeking to obtain a prescription for an aid-in-dying drug pursuant to this part shall submit two oral requests, a minimum of 48 hours apart, and a written request to their attending physician.

[2]  Katy Grimes, "Proposed Amendments to California Assisted Suicide Law Makes Accessing it Easier," California Globe, 04/12/21.
[3]  See Letter from Margaret Dore to Assembly members, September 7, 2015, "Baker Amendments Unenforceable. Bill Still Allows Non-Voluntary and Involuntary Patient Killing Behind Closed Door."