Gays Against Groomers Takes Washington D.C.

Being in Washington, D.C. to save girls’ sports was one for the record books. It was an honor to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with allies, parents, athletes, and everyday Americans who refuse to stay silent. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in two pivotal cases: Little v. Hecox from Idaho and West Virginia v. B.P.J. These challenges target state laws that ban male athletes from competing in female sports. The importance of these cases cannot be overstated. For decades, Title IX has ensured that women and girls have equal opportunities in education and athletics, carving out spaces where they can compete fairly and safely.

But in recent years, a radical push to allow males into female categories has eroded these hard-won protections. In Little v. Hecox, Idaho’s law prohibits biological males from participating in girls’ sports at public schools and colleges, emphasizing sex-based categories to prevent unfair advantages. Similarly, West Virginia v. B.P.J. upholds a ban on male athletes joining female teams, arguing that physical differences rooted in biology (strength, speed, bone density) give males an edge that no amount of hormone suppression can fully erase. Studies from sports scientists show that even after testosterone reduction, male athletes retain significant advantages, leading to displaced female competitors, shattered records, and increased injury risks for girls.