It is very disconcerting to me when I see Marxist leftists who have a poor level of reading comprehension. The simplistic words of the Second Amendment of our individual Bill of Rights should not be cause for confusion. Just as a historical reminder, especially as we approach our 250th Independence celebration, the Second Amendment is rooted in the events of 19 April 1775.
It was on that day that 77 Americans stood on a field in Lexington, Massachusetts, against the greatest military power the world knew at that time. The British regiment was marching inland towards Concord to destroy a weapons manufacturing facility that was supplying the Sons of Liberty. On that day, there was no American Army, Navy, or Marine Corps; matter of fact, there was no America. However, there was an understanding that armed individuals could be free citizens who attain liberty; disarmed individuals can only be subjects.
The militia is every American, not the military. Well-regulated means well-trained, disciplined, and the duty of this well-trained group of citizens is the security of a free State. And what part of “shall not be infringed” is hard to comprehend? Isn’t it rather ironic that the State where armed Americans made a stand against the tyranny of gun control, the beginning of our American Revolution, is now home to the most stringent gun control laws?