"I
hope that with the proposed bill, doctors will get the message that
they need to back off , to make sure that patients are freely choosing
what’s best for them, as chosen by them."
* * *
Dear Senator Padden, Members of the Law and Justice Committee and Senator Angel:
I
am a Registered Nurse. I am writing this letter in support of SB 5919,
which would make it clear that persons asking about assisted suicide
remain eligible to be told about options for cure or to extend life. I
hope that this law will provide protection for people like my brother,
Wes Olfert, who died a few years ago (2011) in Washington State.
When
he was first admitted to the hospital, he made the mistake of asking
about assisted suicide. I say a mistake, because this set off a chain
of events that interfered with his care and caused him unnecessary
stress in what turned out to be the last months of his life.
By
asking the question, he was given a "palliative care" consult by a
doctor who heavily and continually pressured him to give up on treatment
before he was ready to do so. It got so bad that Wes became fearful of
this doctor and asked me and a friend to not leave him alone with her.
I
hope that with the proposed bill, doctors will get the message that
they need to back off, to make sure that patients are freely choosing
what’s best for them, as chosen by them.
Please vote “yes” on SB 5919
Marlene Deakins, RN
Tuscon Arizona
Why Choice is an Illusion?
- Home
- Welcome
- Who We Are, What We Do and How We Do It
- US States Strengthen Laws Against Assisted Suicide
- Margaret Dore Beats the Odds
- Click Here to View Our Charitable Foundation Website
- Winning in Idaho
- Our Board
- Mother Died by Dehydration and Starvation
- Dore Law Review Article on Oregon and Washington
- Definitions
- Contact
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Saturday, February 14, 2015
Senator Jan Angel, Supporting SB 5919
This bill . . . is about choice and common sense. Patients should know all their options before having to make a life-or-death decision.
The bill does not impose any limitations on a person's ability to choose what is best for him or her. It could even be called a technical amendment as it just expands the list of information that is provided to patients before they make their decision.
The bill does not impose any limitations on a person's ability to choose what is best for him or her. It could even be called a technical amendment as it just expands the list of information that is provided to patients before they make their decision.
Kenneth Stevens, MD, supporting SB 5919.
My name is Dr. Kenneth Stevens. I live in Sherwood, Oregon. I'm testifying in favor of Senate Bill 5919, which amends Washington's Death with Dignity Act.
I'm a cancer doctor in Oregon, where we've had the similar act since 1997. I'm also a professor emeritus at Oregon Health and Science University. I previously served as Chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology. I have treated thousands of patients with cancer.
I practice in both Washington state as well as Oregon. I've read the proposed bill, which amends Washington's act to make it clear that patients who request a lethal dose under the act have the right to be told of treatment options for cure and to extend life.
I strongly support this bill, especially due to my experience with a patient named Jeanette Hall. The Oregon and Washington acts apply to patients predicted to have less than six months to live. This does not necessarily mean that the patients are dying. This is true for two reasons:
I'm a cancer doctor in Oregon, where we've had the similar act since 1997. I'm also a professor emeritus at Oregon Health and Science University. I previously served as Chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology. I have treated thousands of patients with cancer.
Jeanette Hall |
I strongly support this bill, especially due to my experience with a patient named Jeanette Hall. The Oregon and Washington acts apply to patients predicted to have less than six months to live. This does not necessarily mean that the patients are dying. This is true for two reasons:
WA State: Vote "YES" on SB 5919.
This is a simple bill, which clarifies that patients considering assisted suicide have a right to be told of their options for cure or to extend life. Passing the bill will be consistent with how Washington's assisted suicide act was marketed to the voters, as providing choice for patients. I urge you to vote "Yes.”
* * *
Below please find my updated memo supporting SB 5919, currently pending in the Washington State Senate. To see a print version, please click here.
Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA
Friday, February 13, 2015
Montana, SB 202 Defeated!
On February 11, 2012, SB 202, which would have legalized assisted suicide and euthanasia in Montana, was tabled in Committee.
Monday, February 9, 2015
Montana: Defeat SB 202!
The Montana Legislature is considering SB 202, which if passed, would legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia in Montana.
SB 202 is modeled on a similar law in Oregon.
SB 202 is modeled on a similar law in Oregon.
The bill, if passed and interpreted in the same way as Oregon's law, will render young adults with chronic conditions such as diabetes, "eligible" for assisted suicide/euthanasia. Such persons can live long healthy lives, for years, even decades. See e.g., here, pp. 4-6 and here, p. A-39.
The bill, if passed, will create the following problems:
- It will encourage people with years to live to throw away their lives.
- It will create new paths of elder abuse, especially in the inheritance context. See e.g., here, p. 15 and here.
- It will empower health care systems to steer patients to suicide, which is well documented in Oregon where assisted suicide is legal. See e.g., here, p. 16, here, p. A-49 and here.
To view documentation regarding other problems with legalization, please click here for the text; click here for the attachments
Please tell the Montana Legislature to vote "NO" on SB 202.
Thank you,
Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA, President
Choice is an Illusion, a human rights organization
206 697 1217.
206 697 1217.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)