Sunday, April 12, 2015
Monday, April 6, 2015
California: Vote NO on SB 128
To read a legal/policy analysis against SB 128, please click here. To view supporting documentation, please click here.
Key points include:
People "eligible" for assisted suicide/euthanasia may have years, even decades, to live, i.e., if they don't die of assisted suicide/euthanasia under SB 128. The bill encourages people with years to live to throw away their lives.
The thrust of SB 128 is to protect doctors and other participants in a patient's death, including family members. This is done in three ways:
Key points include:
People "eligible" for assisted suicide/euthanasia may have years, even decades, to live, i.e., if they don't die of assisted suicide/euthanasia under SB 128. The bill encourages people with years to live to throw away their lives.
The thrust of SB 128 is to protect doctors and other participants in a patient's death, including family members. This is done in three ways:
Monday, March 30, 2015
Montana: Vote "Yes" on HB 477!
HB 477 will reverse Baxter and send a clear message that medical killings are prohibited and against public policy. Individuals will be protected from the medical establishment, individual doctors and family members with something to gain.
A. Involuntary Medical Killings.
Throughout the US, there are increasing reports of involuntary medical killings.[1] Consider a 2012 case against Kaiser Healthcare. Doctors killed the patient, a wealthy older man, through a “terminal extubation.” His daughters had allegedly urged this result in order to obtain large inheritances.[2] In Montana, examples include Dr. James Mungas, who was killed under the guise of hospice/palliative care. His widow, Carol Mungas, states:
Baxter has created confusion in the law and has emboldened some doctors and family members to publicly admit participation in assisted suicides. If HB 477 is not enacted, this situation will likely lead to defacto legality and the following problems:
1. New paths of elder abuse, especially for people with money.
Legal assisted suicide creates new paths of elder abuse. Consider, for example, the Thomas Middleton case, where legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon was part of a financial elder abuse fraud.
2. Steerage to suicide.
It is well documented that Oregon's Medicaid program steers patients to suicide (suicide is covered in lieu of treatments for cure or to extend life). Private health plans and providers have this same ability. To learn more, see this affidavit by Oregon doctor, Kenneth Stevens, MD.
3. Pressure on patients.
See this letter by Marlene Deakins, RN, describing the pressure put on her brother after he merely asked a question about assisted suicide in Washington State.
4. More conventional suicides, including violent suicides.
In Oregon, conventional suicides, including violent suicides, have substantially increased with legalization of assisted suicide. This is consistent with a suicide contagion. The financial cost of these suicides is "enormous." For more information, click here.
5. Pressure to expand to non-terminal people.
In Washington state, there have been "trial balloon" proposals to expand its law to non-terminal people, including those who have simply fallen on hard times. See e.g., this column in the Seattle Times, suggesting euthanasia for people without money for their old age.
Contact your legislators and urge them to vote "YES" on HB 477.
* * *
[1] Peter Whoriskey, "As More Hospices Enroll Patients who Aren't Dying, Questions About Lethal Doses Arise," The Washington Post, August 21, 2014.
[2] William Dotinga, “Grim Complaint Against Kaiser Hospital,” Feb. 6, 2012.
[3] Carol Mungas, athttp://www.montanansagainstassistedsuicide.org/2013/03/i-support-house-bill-505-which-clearly.html
A. Involuntary Medical Killings.
Throughout the US, there are increasing reports of involuntary medical killings.[1] Consider a 2012 case against Kaiser Healthcare. Doctors killed the patient, a wealthy older man, through a “terminal extubation.” His daughters had allegedly urged this result in order to obtain large inheritances.[2] In Montana, examples include Dr. James Mungas, who was killed under the guise of hospice/palliative care. His widow, Carol Mungas, states:
It is traumatic, still, to realize his last communications were attempts to get help.[3]B. Likely Problems
Baxter has created confusion in the law and has emboldened some doctors and family members to publicly admit participation in assisted suicides. If HB 477 is not enacted, this situation will likely lead to defacto legality and the following problems:
1. New paths of elder abuse, especially for people with money.
Legal assisted suicide creates new paths of elder abuse. Consider, for example, the Thomas Middleton case, where legal physician-assisted suicide in Oregon was part of a financial elder abuse fraud.
2. Steerage to suicide.
It is well documented that Oregon's Medicaid program steers patients to suicide (suicide is covered in lieu of treatments for cure or to extend life). Private health plans and providers have this same ability. To learn more, see this affidavit by Oregon doctor, Kenneth Stevens, MD.
3. Pressure on patients.
See this letter by Marlene Deakins, RN, describing the pressure put on her brother after he merely asked a question about assisted suicide in Washington State.
4. More conventional suicides, including violent suicides.
In Oregon, conventional suicides, including violent suicides, have substantially increased with legalization of assisted suicide. This is consistent with a suicide contagion. The financial cost of these suicides is "enormous." For more information, click here.
5. Pressure to expand to non-terminal people.
In Washington state, there have been "trial balloon" proposals to expand its law to non-terminal people, including those who have simply fallen on hard times. See e.g., this column in the Seattle Times, suggesting euthanasia for people without money for their old age.
C. Contact Your Legislators.
Contact your legislators and urge them to vote "YES" on HB 477.
* * *
[1] Peter Whoriskey, "As More Hospices Enroll Patients who Aren't Dying, Questions About Lethal Doses Arise," The Washington Post, August 21, 2014.
[2] William Dotinga, “Grim Complaint Against Kaiser Hospital,” Feb. 6, 2012.
[3] Carol Mungas, athttp://www.montanansagainstassistedsuicide.org/2013/03/i-support-house-bill-505-which-clearly.html
Tuesday, March 17, 2015
Montana: HB 477 PASSES the House!
Yesterday, HB 477, which overrules Montana/s Baxter decision by clarifying that physician-assisted suicide is against public policy and prohibited, passed Montana's House of Representatives.
Monday, March 16, 2015
Elderly Murder-Suicide: Should We Praise Old Men Who Kill Their Wives and Themselves?
"A man who murders his sick, innocent, helpless wife is no hero."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-marquardt/elderly-murder-suicide_b_1402935.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/elizabeth-marquardt/elderly-murder-suicide_b_1402935.html
By Elizabeth Marquardt
On Thursday, March 29, the bodies of Adrienne and Charles Snelling were found. Police believe Charles killed Adrienne -- her exact cause of death is still pending -- and then shot himself. Only last December, Charles Snelling published in the New York Times a poignant and widely-circulated piece about loving and caring for his wife with Alzheimer's disease. (Columnist David Brooks, whose query for life stories initiated Snelling's piece, wrote in his column yesterday about this case.)
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Montana one step closer to reversing Baxter.
Today, the Montana House of Representatives voted to pass HB 477, which clarifies that "physician-assisted suicide" is prohibited and against public policy in Montana.
To view HB 477, please click here.
To view HB 477, please click here.
Wednesday, March 4, 2015
Washington State: SB 5919 passes Senate!
SB 5919, clarifying that patients who request assisted suicide have the right to be told about options for cure or to extend life, has PASSED the Senate! The vote was a bipartisan, 34-14, with one member excused. To see the vote breakdown, click here .
Sunday, March 1, 2015
Utah: Problems with H.B. 391
By Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA
H.B. 391 seeks to legalize physician-assisted suicide in Utah. I am a lawyer in Washington State where we have a similar law. Our law is based on a law in Oregon.
Problems include:
1. HB 391, if enacted, will encourage people with years to live to throw away their lives.
HB 391 seeks to legalize assisted suicide for persons with a "terminal disease," which is defined as having less than six months to live. In Oregon's law, which uses the same definition, young adults with chronic conditions, such as diabetes, are "eligible" for assisted suicide. Such persons can have years, even decades, to live. See https://choiceisanillusion.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/a-2270-3r-memo-12-02-14.pdf "Eligible" patients can also have years to live because doctors can be wrong. See https://choiceisanillusion.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/terminal-uncertainty.pdf and https://choiceisanillusion.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/signed-john-norton-affidavit_001.pdf
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Massachusetts: High School Student Charged with Manslaughter for Encouraging Suicide
BY
JIM HAND SUN CHRONICLE STAFF | Posted: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:00
am
PLAINVILLE A King Philip Regional High School senior has been indicted for involuntary
manslaughter, allegedly for urging a friend to commit suicide. She then raised
money for mental illness in the name of her friend.
Michelle
Carter, 18, of Plainville was indicted as a “youthful offender” by a Bristol
County grand jury, and was arraigned in New Bedford Juvenile Court.
She
is accused of urging Conrad Roy III, 18, of Fairhaven and Mattapoisett to kill
himself, which he did while idling a truck last July in the parking lot of a
Fairhaven Kmart. Authorities said he died of carbon monoxide
poisoning.
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Washington State: SB 5919 on the move!
Last night, SB 5919, which clarifies that a person considering assisted suicide has the right to be told of options for cure or to extend life, has passed out of the Law & Justice Committee.
The vote was bipartisan. The seven member committee voted as follows: 6 "do pass" and 1 "without recommendation." See here
The vote was bipartisan. The seven member committee voted as follows: 6 "do pass" and 1 "without recommendation." See here
Marlene Deakins, RN, Supporting SB 5919
"I
hope that with the proposed bill, doctors will get the message that
they need to back off , to make sure that patients are freely choosing
what’s best for them, as chosen by them."
* * *
Dear Senator Padden, Members of the Law and Justice Committee and Senator Angel:
I am a Registered Nurse. I am writing this letter in support of SB 5919, which would make it clear that persons asking about assisted suicide remain eligible to be told about options for cure or to extend life. I hope that this law will provide protection for people like my brother, Wes Olfert, who died a few years ago (2011) in Washington State.
When he was first admitted to the hospital, he made the mistake of asking about assisted suicide. I say a mistake, because this set off a chain of events that interfered with his care and caused him unnecessary stress in what turned out to be the last months of his life.
By asking the question, he was given a "palliative care" consult by a doctor who heavily and continually pressured him to give up on treatment before he was ready to do so. It got so bad that Wes became fearful of this doctor and asked me and a friend to not leave him alone with her.
I hope that with the proposed bill, doctors will get the message that they need to back off, to make sure that patients are freely choosing what’s best for them, as chosen by them.
Please vote “yes” on SB 5919
Marlene Deakins, RN
Tuscon Arizona
* * *
Dear Senator Padden, Members of the Law and Justice Committee and Senator Angel:
I am a Registered Nurse. I am writing this letter in support of SB 5919, which would make it clear that persons asking about assisted suicide remain eligible to be told about options for cure or to extend life. I hope that this law will provide protection for people like my brother, Wes Olfert, who died a few years ago (2011) in Washington State.
When he was first admitted to the hospital, he made the mistake of asking about assisted suicide. I say a mistake, because this set off a chain of events that interfered with his care and caused him unnecessary stress in what turned out to be the last months of his life.
By asking the question, he was given a "palliative care" consult by a doctor who heavily and continually pressured him to give up on treatment before he was ready to do so. It got so bad that Wes became fearful of this doctor and asked me and a friend to not leave him alone with her.
I hope that with the proposed bill, doctors will get the message that they need to back off, to make sure that patients are freely choosing what’s best for them, as chosen by them.
Please vote “yes” on SB 5919
Marlene Deakins, RN
Tuscon Arizona
Saturday, February 14, 2015
Senator Jan Angel, Supporting SB 5919
This bill . . . is about choice and common sense. Patients should know all their options before having to make a life-or-death decision.
The bill does not impose any limitations on a person's ability to choose what is best for him or her. It could even be called a technical amendment as it just expands the list of information that is provided to patients before they make their decision.
The bill does not impose any limitations on a person's ability to choose what is best for him or her. It could even be called a technical amendment as it just expands the list of information that is provided to patients before they make their decision.
Kenneth Stevens, MD, supporting SB 5919.
My name is Dr. Kenneth Stevens. I live in Sherwood, Oregon. I'm testifying in favor of Senate Bill 5919, which amends Washington's Death with Dignity Act.
I'm a cancer doctor in Oregon, where we've had the similar act since 1997. I'm also a professor emeritus at Oregon Health and Science University. I previously served as Chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology. I have treated thousands of patients with cancer.
I practice in both Washington state as well as Oregon. I've read the proposed bill, which amends Washington's act to make it clear that patients who request a lethal dose under the act have the right to be told of treatment options for cure and to extend life.
I strongly support this bill, especially due to my experience with a patient named Jeanette Hall. The Oregon and Washington acts apply to patients predicted to have less than six months to live. This does not necessarily mean that the patients are dying. This is true for two reasons:
I'm a cancer doctor in Oregon, where we've had the similar act since 1997. I'm also a professor emeritus at Oregon Health and Science University. I previously served as Chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology. I have treated thousands of patients with cancer.
 |
| Jeanette Hall |
I strongly support this bill, especially due to my experience with a patient named Jeanette Hall. The Oregon and Washington acts apply to patients predicted to have less than six months to live. This does not necessarily mean that the patients are dying. This is true for two reasons:
WA State: Vote "YES" on SB 5919.
This is a simple bill, which clarifies that patients considering assisted suicide have a right to be told of their options for cure or to extend life. Passing the bill will be consistent with how Washington's assisted suicide act was marketed to the voters, as providing choice for patients. I urge you to vote "Yes.”
* * *
Below please find my updated memo supporting SB 5919, currently pending in the Washington State Senate. To see a print version, please click here.
Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA
Friday, February 13, 2015
Montana, SB 202 Defeated!
On February 11, 2012, SB 202, which would have legalized assisted suicide and euthanasia in Montana, was tabled in Committee.
Monday, February 9, 2015
Montana: Defeat SB 202!
The Montana Legislature is considering SB 202, which if passed, would legalize assisted suicide and euthanasia in Montana.
SB 202 is modeled on a similar law in Oregon.
SB 202 is modeled on a similar law in Oregon.
The bill, if passed and interpreted in the same way as Oregon's law, will render young adults with chronic conditions such as diabetes, "eligible" for assisted suicide/euthanasia. Such persons can live long healthy lives, for years, even decades. See e.g., here, pp. 4-6 and here, p. A-39.
The bill, if passed, will create the following problems:
- It will encourage people with years to live to throw away their lives.
- It will create new paths of elder abuse, especially in the inheritance context. See e.g., here, p. 15 and here.
- It will empower health care systems to steer patients to suicide, which is well documented in Oregon where assisted suicide is legal. See e.g., here, p. 16, here, p. A-49 and here.
To view documentation regarding other problems with legalization, please click here for the text; click here for the attachments
Please tell the Montana Legislature to vote "NO" on SB 202.
Thank you,
Margaret Dore, Esq., MBA, President
Choice is an Illusion, a human rights organization
206 697 1217.
206 697 1217.
Saturday, February 7, 2015
C & C Defeated on Home Turf!
Yesterday, a Colorado House committee summarily defeated a "death with dignity" act, which had sought to legalize assisted suicide/euthanasia in that state.
The vote was 9 to 4 to postpone House Bill 15-1135 indefinitely.
Thank you to everyone who worked so hard to make this happen!
Margaret Dore
The vote was 9 to 4 to postpone House Bill 15-1135 indefinitely.
Thank you to everyone who worked so hard to make this happen!
Margaret Dore
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)